"Cherry_man1" (Cherry_man1)
12/10/2014 at 16:58 • Filed to: Mustang, 1967, Big Block
4
10|
"Cherry_man1" (Cherry_man1)
12/10/2014 at 16:58 • Filed to: Mustang, 1967, Big Block | 4
| 10 |
Oh it must have a 289 or 302.....
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
NOPE A MOTHER FUCKIN 428Ci!
Whats up with me finding Big Block fords in the winter?
Is it a big block really though
Will with a W8 races an E30
> Cherry_man1
12/10/2014 at 17:02 |
|
Those spark plugs are really really fun.
Party-vi
> Cherry_man1
12/10/2014 at 17:06 |
|
It's definitely a big block., not sure on the displacement.
|
Cherry_man1
> Party-vi
12/10/2014 at 17:10 |
|
Could be a 390
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> Cherry_man1
12/10/2014 at 17:13 |
|
Because FU, front suspension - am I right?
|
Cherry_man1
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
12/10/2014 at 17:20 |
|
Not really, most '67-'73 stangs were made for this application.
|
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> Cherry_man1
12/10/2014 at 17:31 |
|
I know they were ready for big blocks in the broad sense, it was just meant as a reflection on how far things had snowballed since the start of the platform. Same basic setup as had been originally meant for a 144 six, getting heavier and heavier and heavier. Better ball joints, heavier spindles and the like notwithstanding, it makes for a hell of a pounding over the front wheels.
|
Will with a W8 races an E30
> Cherry_man1
12/10/2014 at 17:36 |
|
It's definitely an FE block, its got that stupid little bypass hose on the water pump. Probably 390.
camaroboy68ss
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
12/10/2014 at 17:46 |
|
the biggest reason they shoved the 390 into the stang was because the Camaro was available with the 396 right off the bat.
PyramidHat
> Cherry_man1
12/13/2014 at 20:59 |
|
Mother of God, you can see the marks where they shoehorned that bish in there...
|
Cherry_man1
> PyramidHat
12/13/2014 at 21:02 |
|
A little yes.